Posts Tagged ‘big rig wreck lawyer’
Truck Safety Technologies on the Horizon | Dallas, Texas Personal Injury Attorney Blog
We certainly applaud the trucking industry for recognizing the dangers that certain trucking conditions and driving conditions can cause to the motoring public. The Montes Law Group is proud to blog about the array of technologies on the horizon being developed by commercial truck manufacturers as well as technology producers working to better equip commercial truck drivers with the safety devices needed to better protect drivers, passengers and other vehicles on the road. Among the technologies being developed are the following:
* The vehicle integrated safety system that offers lane departure warnings for forward, side and lane departures using radar and vision technologies.
* Headway alert system, which provides a driver with feedback on safe and unsafe following distances by using visual and audio alerts.
* A lane departure warning system that uses a camera to alert drivers when they have drifted out of their intended lane and the system uses algorithms to stop alerts when turn signals have been used.
* A drowsy driver alert system attempts to reduce vehicle accidents caused by sleepy drivers by using an imaging sensor and infrared illuminators to determine the number of eye closure rates that occur for an individual driver. Additionally, this system can automatically use fresh air, alert tones or phone calls as well as audio signals that a driver pull off of the road.
In addition to new-aged technology being developed to ease commercial truck driver’s worries of becoming involved in an accident, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is in its third year of its driver information sharing project known as the Enhanced CVISN. The system was designed to “enhance the safety, security and productivity of commercial vehicle operations and to improve access to and quality of information about commercial drivers, carriers, vehicles, chassis, cargo, inspections, crashes, compliance reviews and citations for authorized and public and private sector users,” according to the FMCSA Technology Division.
The project is also responsible for gathering and maintaining statistics on commercial truck carriers involved in accidents, receiving tickets as well as roadside assistance.
Commercial truck accidents are among the most deadly and dangerous collisions that can occur. Most often these accidents involve either serious injury/bodily harm to those involved or can cause a fatality affecting more than just a victim and their family and friends.
Because evidence and information gathering is so vitally important in the hours and days following a truck wreck or collision, people and families who have suffered a loss resulting from a truck wreck or collision should consider consulting with an experienced law firm that will offer a free legal consultation as to a victim’s specific truck accident case to determine the best course of action for a victim who may be suffering medically and financially from a heavy truck wreck. To learn more about truck accidents please visit www.monteslawgroup.com . Call us today, we can help. Rachel E. Montes 214-522-9401.
CELL PHONE AND TEXTING LAWS STATE BY STATE | Dallas, Texas Personal Injury Attorney Blog
Several cities and towns have enacted local laws prohibiting the use of cell phone devices while driving. States are soon to follow suit, and many states have enacted legislation restricting or banning cell phone device use altogether. You need to be aware of these changes in order to drive safe. If you are hit by someone using a cell phone device while driving, you may have other legal remedies of recovery available to you in light of these laws, such as “negligence as a matter of law” causes of action because the offender actually broke the law, and that was a proximate cause of the accident or collision.
This chart outlines all state cell phone and text messaging laws. Some local jurisdictions may have additional regulations. Enforcement type is shown in parenthesis.
- Handheld Cell Phones: 8 states (Calif., Conn., Del., Md., N.J., N.Y., Ore. and Wash.), D.C. and the Virgin Islands prohibit all drivers from using handheld cell phones while driving.
- Except for Maryland, all laws are primary enforcement-an officer may cite a driver for using a handheld cell phone without any other traffic offense taking place.
- All Cell Phone Use:No state bans all cell phone use (handheld and hands-free) for all drivers, but many prohibit all cell phone use by certain drivers:
- Novice Drivers: 28 states and D.C. ban all cell phone use by novice drivers.
- School Bus Drivers: Bus drivers in 18 states and D.C. may not use a cell phone when passengers are present.
- Text Messaging:30 states, D.C. and Guam ban text messaging for all drivers. 11 of these laws were enacted in 2010. 26 states, D.C., and Guam have primary enforcement. In the other four, texting bans are secondary.
- Novice Drivers: An additional 8 states prohibit text messaging by novice drivers.
- School Bus Drivers: 2 states restrict school bus drivers from texting while driving.
- Some states such as Maine, N.H. and Utah treat cell phone use and texting as part of a larger distracted driving issue. In Utah, cellphone use is an offense only if a driver is also committing some other moving violation (other than speeding).
Crash Data Collection: Many states include a category for cell phone/electronic equipment distraction on police accident report forms. Recently proposed federal legislation would require states to collect this data in order to qualify for certain federal funding.
Preemption Laws: Many localities have passed their own distracted driving bans. However, some states – such as Fla., Ky., La., Miss., Nev., and Okla. – prohibit localities from enacting such laws.
State | Handheld Ban | All Cell Phone Ban | Text Messaging Ban | Crash Data |
|||
School Bus Drivers | Novice Drivers | All Drivers |
School Bus Drivers | Novice Drivers | |||
Alabama | 16, and 17 wtih intermediate license <6 months (Primary) |
16, and 17 wtih intermediate license <6 months (Primary) |
|||||
Alaska | Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||||
Arizona | Yes (Primary) |
||||||
Arkansas | 18 – 20 years old (Primary) | Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Secondary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |
California | Yes (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Secondary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |
Colorado | <18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |||
Connecticut | Yes (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Learners Permit and <18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | ||
Delaware | Yes (Primary) (eff. 1/2/11) |
Yes (Primary) |
Learner’s permit and intermediate license holders (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) (eff. 1/2/11) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |
D.C. | Yes (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Learners Permit (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |
Florida | |||||||
Georgia | Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||
Guam | Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | |||||
Hawaii 1 | See footnote | ||||||
Idaho 2 | See footnote | ||||||
Illinois 3 | See footnote | Yes (Primary) |
<19 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |
Indiana | <18 (Primary) |
<18 (Primary) |
Yes | ||||
Iowa | Restricted or Intermediate Licenses (Primary) |
Yes (Secondary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |||
Kansas | Learner or Intermediate License (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |||
Kentucky | Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | |||
Louisiana | Learner or Intermediate License (regardless of age) |
Yes (Primary) |
1st year of licensure (Primary for <18) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |
Maine 4 | <18 (Primary) |
<18 (Primary) |
Yes | ||||
Maryland | Yes (Secondary) |
<18 w/ Learner or Provisional License (Secondary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||
Massachusetts | Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||
Michigan 5 | See footnote | Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |||
Minnesota | Yes (Primary) |
<18 w/ Learner or Provisional License (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||
Mississippi | Learner or Provisional License (Primary) |
||||||
Missouri | <21 (Primary) |
||||||
Montana | Yes | ||||||
Nebraska | <18 w/ Learners or Provisional License (Secondary) |
Yes (Secondary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |||
Nevada | Yes | ||||||
New Hampshire 6 | Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | |||||
New Jersey | Yes (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
<21 w/ GDL or Provisional License (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |
New Mexico | In State vehicles | Yes | |||||
New York | Yes (Primary) |
Yes (Secondary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |||
North Carolina | Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | |||
North Dakota | Yes | ||||||
Ohio | |||||||
Oklahoma | Learners Permit or Intermediate License (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Learners Permit or Intermediate License (Primary) |
Yes | ||
Oregon | Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||
Pennsylvania | Yes | ||||||
Rhode Island | Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||
South Carolina 7 | See footnote | ||||||
South Dakota | Yes | ||||||
Tennessee | Yes (Primary) |
Learners Permit or Intermediate License (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||
Texas 8 | Yes, w/ passenger <17 (Primary) |
Intermediate Stage, 1st 12 mos. (Primary) |
Yes, w/ passenger <17 (Primary) |
Intermediate Stage, 1st 12 mos. (Primary) |
Yes | ||
Utah 9 | See footnote | Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |||
Vermont | <18 (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | ||||
Virgin Islands | Yes | Yes | |||||
Virginia | Yes (Primary) |
<18 (Secondary) |
Yes (Secondary) |
Covered under all driver ban (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | |
Washington | Yes (Primary) |
Learner or Intermediate Stage (Primary) |
Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||
West Virginia | Learner or Intermediate Stage (Primary) |
Learner or Intermediate Stage (Primary) |
|||||
Wisconsin | Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | |||||
Wyoming | Yes (Primary) |
Covered under all driver ban | Yes | ||||
Total | 8 + D.C., Virgin Islands Primary (7) Secondary (1) |
18 + D.C. All Primary |
28 + D.C. Primary (23 + D.C.) Secondary (5) |
30 + D.C., Guam Primary (26 + D.C., Guam) Secondary (4) |
2 Both Primary |
8 All Primary |
34 + D.C., Virgin Islands |
1 Hawaii does not have a state law banning the use of handheld cell phones. However, all of the state’s counties have enacted distracted driving ordinances.
2 Idaho has a “Distraction in/on Vehicle (List)” attribute as part of its Contributing Circumstances element, and officers are supposed to list the distractions in the narrative.
3 Illinois bans the use of cell phones while driving in a school zone or in a highway construction zone.
4 Maine has passed a law making it against the law to drive while distracted in the state.
5 In Michigan, teens with probationary licenses whose cell phone usage contributes to a traffic crash or ticket may not use a cell phone while driving.
6 Dealt with as a distracted driving issue; New Hampshire enacted a comprehensive distracted driving law.
7 South Carolina has a Distracted/inattention attribute under Contributing Factors.
8 Texas has banned the use of hand-held phones and texting in school zones.
9 Utah’s law defines careless driving as committing a moving violation (other than speeding) while distracted by use of a handheld cellphone or other activities not related to driving.
Sources: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and State Highway Safety Offices.